What to say of Franz. the Mesmer, that although diverse cures duly registered, folloied and proven for doctors of time, reached by means of the use of the animal magnetic fluid, was accused with quack and had its theories refused for the Real Society of Medicine of Paris. The accusations and the commentaries little based on the Esprita Doctrine on the current days are not uncommon. Popularly also we hear many times commentaries as: . The espiritismo is thing of the devil; . The communication with deceased is sin; .
Exactly that a spirit appears for me I I do not go to believe that it is, therefore is the devil acting; . Esprita does not believe God, much less in Jesus Christ; . Esprita not however; . Esprita makes ‘ ‘ macumba’ ‘ , it sacrifices animals, it has rituals; . Very well-taken care of therefore if you to enter in this ‘ ‘ coisa’ ‘ of the espiritismo, it does not go to be able to leave more; . The espritas lunatic, wild and are unbalanced; etc. Where they are the argument based on all? For reflection ends I appeal again to Codificar, that says in them that: ‘ ‘ If it only can consider as serious critic that one that all visa had, everything studied, with the patience and the perseverance of a concientious observer; that he knew on this subject in such a way how much the most clarified adept; that he had not extracted its knowledge of the romances of sciences; to who no fact of its unfamiliarity could not oppose, no argument that it had not meditado; that it refuted, not for negations, but by means of other more fixed arguments; that it could, at last, attribute to a more logical cause to the facts averiguados.’ ‘ (Esprita Magazine, 1860, P.