We can affirm that these had been the first traces of fight for schools in the encampments, therefore the fight for the land was not only enough, and with the practical proper o Movement perceived the necessity to construct schools, consisting that the fight is well more complex, and has to see with the social rights that also they need to be conquered. We could be today studying a history in parallel, what, in general way, it happened with other movements and organizations of workers in our country and other places. But the historical fact is that, for some circumstances and choices, we can deal with one same history: the history of the relation of the without-land with the school is part of the history of the MST. (CALDART, 2004, P. 224). The MST is a social movement of mass, that fights beyond the conquest of the land, for a society joust, since me the distribution of the land, is an unjust organization. Then it thinks about a space where if it finds hundreds (thousand) of together people who desire and practise this search ()? the nestings and encampments.
Then it has that to transmit itself, to live this reality. Thus, the movement argued and thought about an education with its especificidade. It has who thought at the beginning that it would have to be two separate fights, a thing was the fight for the land, and another age the fight for the education, however, then they had perceived that the two did not dissociam one of the other, is a way of double hand, forming a set of social life in its spaces. The fight for the land alone, already was not enough, therefore the society all already is consumed. to invert this logic, the fight is well more complex, and has to see with the right partners whom also they need to be conquered.