United States World

In the long run, who ends up consuming all the sweepings is the nature while the humanity continues putting its changes of habits pending to leave the recession first and to sustain the growth of the economy later. But what means growth of the economy, those two or three percent that obsesses to the entire world, of North to the South and This the West? The world is convinced that it is in a terrible crisis. But the world always was in crisis. Now it is defined as world-wide crisis because (1) it comes and it affects the economy of richest; (2) the simplified paradigm of the development has radiated its hysteria to the rest of the world, having remained to him legitimacy. But in the United States the people continue flooding the stores and the restaurants and their cuts never arrive at the hunger, even in the gravity of million workers without work. In ours peripheral countries a crisis means children in the street asking alms. In the United States a little usually means consumers less consuming while they wait for the next check of the government.

In order to leave that crises, the specialists express the brain and the solution is always the same: to increase the consumption. Ironically, to increase to the consumption rendering to him to common people its own money through the great private banks that receive the rescuing aid of the government. It is not only tried to save some banks, but, mainly, to save an ideology and a culture that do not survive in case single but on the basis of frequent ad hoc injections: financial stimuli, wars that drive the industry and control the popular participation, drugs and diversions that stimulate, tranquilize and anaesthetise in the name of the communal property. We will have really left the crisis when the world retakes a growth of the five percent by means of the stimulus of the consumption in the rich countries? We will not be preparing the next crisis, human a real crisis and an ecological and not artificial crisis like which we have today? We will really occur account that this one is not really a crisis but only one warning, that is to say, one opportunity to change our habits? Every day is a crisis because every day we chose a way. But there are crises that are a one long way crusis and other that are critics because, as much for pressed as for opresores it means one double possibility: the confirmation of a system or its destruction.

Until now it has been first by lack of alternatives to second. But never it is necessary to underestimate to history. Nobody would never have anticipated an alternative to the medieval feudalism or the system of slavery. Or almost nobody. The history of the last millenia demonstrates that the utopian ones used to anticipate it with exaggerated precision. But like today, the utopian ones always have had bad fame. Because it is the ridicule and the loss of prestige the form that each dominant system has always had to avoid the proliferation of people with too much imagination.