Of form that, the official notice argues the different social initiatives and politics of the Commune and mainly its antistate characteristic, sentencing that the workers do not have to take the machine of the State, but yes, to destroy it. In the assays for the writing of the official notice Marx it leaves which well clearly were the intentions of the laboring classroom: ‘ ‘ It was a revolution against the proper State, this abortion sobenatural abortion of the society; it was a taking for the people and for the people of its proper social life … was a revolution to finish with this terrible device of domination of classe’ ‘ (MARX apud LWY, 2011, 84). We consider that valley the penalty to the socialist ones to review the Commune, therefore, interests in them to desconstruir ‘ ‘ socialist myth of the Comuna’ ‘ (BOITO Jr, 2011, 42), without losing the same laboring perspective of, since as in them it indicates Karl Marx (1983), the diverse ones they had been the initiatives of protection to the work and the poor persons, but a measure only had a socialist content: namely, that the plants abandoned for the proprietor would be controlled for the proprietors. This is not the sufficient to declare that the Commune was a government socialist, as as much desire, not even Marx thinks this, for the opposite, it she only affirms that it was a laboring government, and in agreement Boito Jr (2011), hardly could have been. Since the immediate objective of the Commune was to put down a considered government of national treason and to give account of a democratic task, that the Revolution of 1789 had not given account, that was the laicizao of the State, transformations of bourgeois type that, according to F..
Previous
Next