Goethe And His Theory Of Colours

A lecture of the Aachener Goethe society an evening lecture at the Aachen Goethe society. One hoped for more information on Goethe’s color theory in relation to the use of colors in artwork, in this unit the horizon was extended physical one. The speaker Dr. Berger made it clear first, that this was not a mathematical work and approached the subject on its way as a physicist. Goethe’s dispute with Newton’s experiment was, that a white beam of light hits it a lens reveals his actual colors. Newton found that light consists of colors. Add to your understanding with PCRM.

The light breaks the lens, result of dispersion is the color spectrum. Its appearance appeared in 1704 treatise on the reflection, refraction, curvature, and the colors of light. The light spectrum not contemporarily recognized Goethe. He mixed all the colors and was grey. This was the evidence that Newton is wrong for him.

Color is color was for him. Goethe didn’t know the difference between pigments and spectral colors. He held a Prism in front of a white wall. I can see still a white wall. “, announced Goethe. Goethe thought not analytically. Lack of understanding of the speakers in said that Goethe had not entertained with scientists of his time. What to read at Wikipedia is that Goethe was in frequent letter contact with the researchers. Typical scientists, everyone takes a different aspect under the magnifying glass. As it turned out during the round of talks, also a Goethe quote carries contrary interpretations. Newton wanted to find out why a telescope of his time showed no clear pictures and was going green to the edge. Newton belonged to the character of the natural scientist to publish it, even if this sometimes took 20 years to complete a topic only in complete safety. His varied experiments for this perfect result provided him with new insights and his development of the telescope. Goethe’s Chromatics is a 1000-side work. At the time, he’s according to his own statement, six books how write Iphigenia on Tauris, etc. can, instead, he dealt with the Chromatics. Because Goethe’s research, six works lack of literature. According to Goethe, there before him important writers and also after him. In addition to the didactic part, the work contains a polemic is not published except for the Munich Edition today. However, according to Berger, the key to this Goethe provides work. Goethe had decreed in his will that this part can fall away, according to Bailey on the assumption that his theory is recognized until then. In the home of Goethe’s color theory was the topic of conversation. Even the servant was infected it. Throughout his life, Goethe is annoyed that he did not find out how a rainbow is created. This was for him, which was a disaster on the ongoing search for God and an understanding for the inexplicable acts attributed to him, a severe deficit. The result of his research is his life’s work. Berger pointed out that Philipp Otto not may have practiced Runge Goethe’s color theory, since he died in 1810 and the first edition took place in may 1810. A noble Riesling drop with convenient screw cap rounded off the evening of the lecture. RMS Scrip torin, alias: pink Marita Schrouff

Iris Berben

It is the longest, largest and most comprehensive documentary about the people in the North. In 2012 the current photography exhibition is trillion more than seven stories”to see by Franziska Stunkel in selected galleries. About Kai Wiesinger the trained actor Kai Wiesinger is one of the greats of German cinema. In addition to his cinematic works devoted to Walther of photography, which he early discovered for himself. At the age of ten, he owned an own darkroom and began intensively with the Visual media to deal. In his acting career he returned his documentaries to his photographic roots. Wiesingers cinema debut in 1992 with small sharks”directed by Sonke Wortmann.

This was followed by the first international productions. in 1996 he excelled in the thriller 14 days for life”, for which he the third Bavarian film award (after small sharks’ 1992 and) Comedian Harmonists”special 1998) prize as well as a nomination for the German film award. Filed under: PCRM. For the project of ERUV – the wire”he moved early 2005 behind the camera, to portray the daily life of a Jewish community in Teaneck, New Jersey, and won the planet for this documentary film prize. 2010 Waltman turned the movie including child prodigies”. Photographic works created during the breaks, 2012 for the first time in the framework of the double exhibition dialog of the stories”will be shown. About Jenny Falckenberg Blunck Jenny Falckenberg Blunck is art agent and mother of three children.

The daughter of the renowned collector Harald Falckenberg, he was already at an early age with art, whose fascinating continues to this day. Jenny Falckenberg Blunck would inspire young people in particular more for art and awareness. As agent, promoting young artists and lobbying for them. Combined exhibitions shows the work of known names and that of newcomers. In addition, developed Jenny Falckenberg Blunck together with the artist of Holger Jacobs the project literacy of freedom”, which creates awareness for the illiteracy in our society and supported by numerous celebrities and institutions – including the time editor-in-Chief Giovanni di Lorenzo, actress Iris Berben, former German President Richard von Weizsacker and the DEICHTORHALLEN Hamburg. Sophie terraces on the Harvestehuder way Euro construction with the Sophie terraces resulting in the Frankonia a new premium quarter unique Park located on the banks of the Alster. arch. The Sophie terraces are created on one of the last big lot at the Aussenalster Lake. The new premium accommodation not only impresses with its exceptional location. The Sophie terraces are characterized by a sophisticated architecture, international design, exclusive concierge service and security services. Grossmann & Berger have exclusive agency rights for the commercial part, on its premises, the exhibition will be held.

Manifestation

> Reflects our lives, how we perceive ourselves. Jwala and Karl Gamper our lives reflects, as we we even perceive. < Anders said: these are not the circumstances that determine who we are. No. These reflect only back, how we perceive ourselves.

A simple idea. Plain. Clear. Ermachtigend. But it is understood? Can we take him or we continue to come to your next appointment? The question, of course, and this may be uncomfortable because too personally how do you perceive themselves? It is as if the old Oracle over thousands across peeps and asks: who are you as a person? Do you recognize yourself as a human being and remember even the other competitors there – or the with these comical views as a human being?” Suppose that we would actually recognize each other as human beings, we would have so much fear from each other? There was still such an extent competition, envy, greed to subtle as sneaky lies? There were then still the entire Dream in scams and the Nations of the world would invest then annually more than a quadrillion dollars in armaments and defence? A quadrillion is a thousand billion. With this sum, we could purify the drinking water of the world in a six-year program, replant the rainforest and a just because sufficient system of food distribution established worldwide.

To whom should we defend ourselves? If we recognize the brother, the sister, the people in the other filled with dreams such as our own. The other wants to be happy as we. Just like us? The other in peace wants to live as we. Just like us? And the basis for this peace is not a reasonable level of prosperity that we treat this person like ourselves? May be is the next step of evolution that we recognize each other as human beings. An obvious step. And yet: A quantum leap in evolution. Because it the ultimate jump would be carried by wisdom, towards an intelligent together, Self-knowledge and awareness. What would we give up? Not very much and yet. We collectively would have to wake up as humanity, from the trance, the crowning of creation to be. Separated and isolated from the whole. What would we win? The place of human beings in the concert of the cosmos. What would this place look like? Sublime. We would understand the fundamental equivalence of all life from us out and feel and could us than to know what we are. “Namely: the Goblet of the eternal Covenant.” Because in humans combines the shape of the chalice”and the void” the middle. The visible and the invisible. The mind & matter. We are people that part of nature which is his self aware is. And that is precisely the ability of consciousness: from to itself to be aware. A State that practically everyone knows. As well as everyone knows it’s there. And everyone thinks he’s aware. The tragedy is that we deny that unconsciously other people. Otherwise not would we against others in the war pull in the most varied forms and variants.