Formal Dress

When we talk about a special occasion such as for example a cocktail, the image that comes to mind is not more that of a beautiful girl, with beautiful legs in a party dress. However when the feast is described differently in the invitation changes history. When for example is notified that the feast is black tie is deduced that the attire should be formal or gala. How is it possible to distinguish the party from the formal dresses then? Is there really any difference between them? How can I be sure of that I’m wearing the right dress for the occasion? Here are some consejillos that will help you to choose the dress you need for that formal event have invited which you. A prom dress formality usually gathers the characteristics necessary for a semi-formal special event such as a cocktail, despite requiring a degree of formality leaving open window to a more relaxed than prescribed once attire of black tie or Gala. A formal dress on the other hand, is that dress that you use for events prescribed with an even higher degree of formality such as weddings, awards or some galas for fundraising and charity. To choose that dress must take into account undoubtedly the degree of formality of the event already that if one of these prescribed events and galas decide to wear a ball gown any you can be seen as someone not very cultivated and even ignorant since these events usually have a high degree of solemnity implied.

Skirt length that you use in a semi-formal occasion prom dress can extend from the middle of the thigh to the knee. You just need to choose that dress that best highlight your qualities and suits your figure and your body shape. A dress at the height of the middle of the world will work incredibly on someone who has beautiful legs while a dress to the knee will always work well for any body type.

Popular Movements

The two leave from the same definition of the popular movements, as far as the construction of a new policy and to the recovery of the ethical values. Here it is where the artist or the intellectual, finds a space that the neoliberal model left in the basket of wastes: the ethics. The art is a cosmovisin. It is to conceive to the man in relation to his resemblances, with his circumstances, the universe, itself. It is the space in which the creative activity of the man is developed. The eternal search of the truth, the good and the beauty. It needs the freedom and this one of the art in a dialectic relation.

The freedom is a universal value. It determines and one ties to a culture based on the recognition of the right of all, to the dignity, the respect, the overcoming. This culture is the search of the good through the beauty. The freedom defines the personality of the individual and a nation. The artistic creation must contain it until in the line more imperceptible. The fight by the life and the freedom is creating new answers in each circumstance.

For this reason, the artist represents who them not will see never braking by aesthetic inertia, since its work feeds on the permanent evolution of the man and its history. Its work will be infiltrated with and in the spirit of the town and it does not have left another horizon that to commit itself ethically, historically social and with the collective destiny. The artist can feel comfortable neither in this one nor in no other world. Because any type of structure will offer resistance to the satisfaction of its imagination and its dreams. For that reason it must know, suffer, enjoy the world as it is, to know, suffer and enjoy the result his own search: a creative world.